Double Serum, anti-aging ranges and formulative analysis by a doctor
Article written by Dr Sylvain David - Plastic and aesthetic surgeon - Updated: March 2026
Information : This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute a medical consultation. BeautyDecoded application allows you to choose cosmetics adapted to your skin type thanks to artificial intelligence.
| Product | Note BD | Notice (n) | Verdict |
| Multi-Intensive Eye Zone Concentrate | 5,00/5 | 2 | Sensitive skin 0 - immediate smoothing effect |
| Hydra-Essentiel HA2+ Superactivated Bi-Serum | 5,00/5 | 2 | Universal profile 88-91 - loyalty |
| Hydra-Essentiel Bi-Sérum Intensif | 5,00/5 | 2 | Normal to dry skin 84-91 |
| Hydra-Essentiel Matifying Gel | 5,00/5 | 1 | Oily skin 84-91 (DISCOVERY) |
| Double Serum Light | 4,25/5 | 2 | Anti-ageing 87.55 but oily skin 0 / 86 €. |
| Pure-Reset Blemish Serum | 3,00/5 | 1 | Imperfections 76.5 oily skin (DISCOVERY) |
| Hydrating Toning Lotion | 3,25/5 | 2 | Sensitive skin -8.0 - irritating fragrance |
| Very Cleansing Oil | 2,50/5 | 4 | FLOP - chemical smell, stings the eyes |
| Sun Care Cream SPF 50+ | 2,00/5 | 1 | Confirmed tingling - homosalate |
| Tonic Express Cleanser | 2,00/5 | 1 | Insufficient cleansing, irritating fragrance |
Note on BeautyDecoded reviews: the ratings and review excerpts displayed on this page come from users of the BeautyDecoded application. These reviews are not verified. Publication dates and review details are available on each product sheet.
Clarins claims «proven results» with impressive percentages from tests on 360 women. These results come from satisfaction tests - not clinical studies. The distinction is fundamental.
| Criteria | Satisfaction test | Randomized clinical trial |
| Method | Subjective questionnaire for participants | Standardized objective measurements (profilometry, image analysis) |
| Comparison | No placebo, no control | Placebo group, double-blind |
| Proof value | Marketing - useful perceptions | Scientific - biological efficiency |
| Clarins (Double Serum) | 91% perceive smoother skin | No independent clinical studies published |
«At 86 euros for 30 ml, the formula has to be compared with what the same budget can buy in concentrated, documented active ingredients at stated concentrations. The comparison is not favorable to Double Serum.»
Double Serum contains 21 botanical extracts. An honest assessment: 5 to 6 are formulatively interesting, 15 have weak, very weak or non-existent evidence. None is a first-rate corrective anti-ageing active ingredient.
| Extract (Double Serum) | Property claimed | Available evidence | Verdict |
| Horse chestnut (escine) | Anti-inflammatory, microcirculation | Givaudan independent studies | Solid |
| Oats | Soothing, barrier repair | Very strong - atopy reference | Solid |
| Avocado oil | Nourishing, antioxidant | Solids - unsaponifiables | Solid |
| Edelweiss | Antioxidant, lifting | Correct - collar-lifting effect. | Moderate |
| Turmeric | Anti-inflammatory, antioxidant | Correct in vitro + supplier | Moderate |
| Ginger | Antioxidant, photoprotection | Supplier data (Seppic) | Low |
| Quinoa | Emollient, antioxidant | Few independent studies | Low |
| Banana | Moisturizing, antioxidant | Virtually non-existent - Clarins | Very low |
| Cocoa | De-stressing, relaxing | Food data, not cosmetics | Anecdotal |
| Qualicapa / Mandji | Not documented | No study - exclusive to Clarins | None |
Please note: fragrance is present in almost all Clarins formulas, with the exception of the Calm Essentiel range. Over the long term, fragrance can be allergenic, irritating and photosensitizing - particularly problematic in anti-aging serums for prolonged daily use.
| Clarins product | Price | What's in the same budget |
| Double Serum 30 ml | 86 € | C-Firma Drunk Elephant (AA 15% + vit E + ferulic) + COSRX 6 Peptides Serum (150 ml) |
| Double Serum 50 ml | 126 € | Retinol SVR Ampoule 1% + Niacinamide 10% Paula's Choice + Innisfree Mineral SPF |
| Extra Firming Cream 50 ml | 84 € | Balancium Ceramide COSRX + Retinol Eye Cream Medicube + BHA Paula's Choice |
| Multi Intensive serum | ~95 € | Serum 6 Peptides COSRX + Azide Theramide + Tetra EF Theramide |
4.25/5 - 2 opinion BeautyDecoded | Price : ~86 € / 30 ml | Range : Double Serum
BeautyDecoded algorithmic scores
| Profile / Issues | BD score |
| Dry skin | 84.0 |
| Oily skin | 0.0 |
| Normal to dry skin | 91.0 |
| Normal to oily skin | 80.5 |
| Sensitive skin | -0.5 |
| Anti-aging | 87.5 |
| Imperfections | 17.0 |
| Redness | 8.5 |
| Stains | 61.2 |
Verdict Sensitivity (Dr David rule) : Slight caution recommended (score: -0.5)
Expert deciphering
Double-bottle galenic (aqueous phase + oily phase) + phytosphingosine derivative (Lissignol, supplier study Evonik) + 21 botanical extracts including 5-6 relevant ones (chestnut, oat, avocado, edelweiss, turmeric). BeautyDecoded anti-aging score: 87.55 - the highest in Clarins' catalog. Oily skin score: 0 - strictly contraindicated. Blemish score: 61.2 - relevant.
BeautyDecoded score: 4.25/5 from just 2 reviews. Feedback confirms hydration and radiance - but the Light version is described as «rather oily despite the oily skin indication» in one review. Signal consistent with oily skin score of 0. Suitable profile: normal to dry skin (scores 84-91).
Central problem: no first-rate corrective anti-aging active ingredients (no retinol, no documented signal peptides, no pure vitamin C in effective concentration, no active BHA/AHA). The algorithmic anti-aging score of 87.55 reflects the plant active ingredients present, not their independently proven efficacy. At €86/30 ml, the comparison with documented alternatives is unfavorable.
My analysis
«Double Serum Light has the best algorithmic anti-aging score in the Clarins catalog (87.55) but no top-tier corrective actives. The 2 BeautyDecoded reviews confirm hydration - not measurable anti-aging efficacy. Oily skin score 0: contraindicated despite «combination skin» positioning. At €86, the Q/P ratio is inexcusable compared to documented alternatives.»
Verdict: - FLOP Q/P - Anti-aging algorithm score 87.55 but no documented corrective active ingredients. Oily skin score 0. 2 insufficient reviews. 86€ unjustified vs alternatives.
BeautyDecoded user reviews (2 reviews in total)
4.3/5 «The texture is rather oily despite the oily skin indication. Penetrates well and suits my slightly dry skin. I've regained my lost radiance.»
4.3/5 «Good moisturizing and softening serum for thirsty skin. Would recommend.»
5.00/5 - 2 opinion BeautyDecoded | Price : ~55 € / 30 ml | Range : Hydra-Essentiel
BeautyDecoded algorithmic scores
| Profile / Issues | BD score |
| Dry skin | 88.2 |
| Oily skin | 91.0 |
| Normal to dry skin | 88.2 |
| Normal to oily skin | 91.0 |
| Sensitive skin | -1.5 |
| Anti-aging | 26.4 |
| Imperfections | 0.0 |
| Redness | 0.0 |
| Stains | 5.1 |
Verdict Sensitivity (Dr David rule) : Slight caution recommended (score: -1.5)
Expert deciphering
Biphasic serum AH + polyphenols. Oily skin score: 91 and normal to oily skin score: 91 - optimal universal profile. Dry skin score: 88.2 - excellent. Sensitive skin score: -1.5 - slight caution due to fragrance. BeautyDecoded score: 5/5 out of 2 reviews - insufficient but unanimous basis.
BeautyDecoded feedback confirms effective hydration on normal to dry dehydrated skin. Loyalty reported (used «for years») - a sign of long-term results. The two-phase texture is appreciated for its sensory appeal. High price (55€/30 ml) reported as a negative point.
Anti-aging score: 26.35 - moderate, consistent with a non-corrective moisturizing serum. This product is honest in its moisturizing positioning - without excessive anti-aging claims. The presence of fragrance (sensitive skin score -1.5) remains a signal for caution on highly reactive profiles.
My analysis
«Hydra-Essentiel Bi-Serum is one of Clarins» most honest products - a moisturizing serum with real scores (oily skin 91, dry skin 88.2), a 5/5 rating and confirmed customer loyalty. Limitations: present fragrance (sensitivity -1.5) and high price (€55/30 ml) for a moisturizing serum with no corrective active ingredients."
Verdict: - Correct - Universal hydration score (88-91). Score 5/5, loyalty confirmed. Perfume: sensitivity -1.5. 55€/30 ml: questionable Q/P ratio for pure moisturizer.
BeautyDecoded user reviews (2 reviews in total)
5.0/5 «Excellent for my dehydrated normal to dry skin. I had noticed great hydration, plumped skin. Stopped using it to try something else but forgot about it - want to try again.»
5.0/5 «A good serum, it moisturizes well and leaves skin soft. The two-phase texture is very pleasant to wear. Only negative point: the price.»
5.00/5 - 2 opinion BeautyDecoded | Price : ~50 € / 30 ml | Range : Hydra-Essentiel
BeautyDecoded algorithmic scores
| Profile / Issues | BD score |
| Dry skin | 84.0 |
| Oily skin | 38.5 |
| Normal to dry skin | 91.0 |
| Normal to oily skin | 66.5 |
| Sensitive skin | -1.1 |
| Anti-aging | 45.0 |
| Imperfections | 0.0 |
| Redness | 0.0 |
| Stains | 45.0 |
Verdict Sensitivity (Dr David rule) : Slight caution recommended (score: -1.1)
Expert deciphering
Classic two-phase anti-thirst serum. Dry skin score: 84 and normal to dry skin score: 91 - optimal profile for normal to dry skin. Oily skin score: 38.5 - not suitable. Sensitive skin score: -1.1 - slight caution. Score 5/5 on 2 reviews.
Comparison with the Overactivated version (HA2+): this version has a less universal profile (oily skin 38.5 vs. 91) but a slightly higher anti-aging score (45.05 vs. 26.35). The 2 BeautyDecoded reviews are unanimously positive, with long-lasting loyalty reported.
The two-phase texture is characteristic of the Hydra-Essentiel range - mix the two phases before application. Confirmed hydration and skin rebound. Price reported as negative in one review.
My analysis
«Hydra-Essentiel Bi-Sérum classique is suitable for normal to dry skin (scores 84-91) with confirmed customer loyalty. Oily skin profile 38.5: to be avoided for this type of skin (prefer the Suractivé HA2+ version, score 91). Same reservations on price (50€/30 ml) and fragrance (sensitivity -1.1). »
Verdict: - Correct - Optimal profile for normal to dry skin (84-91). Rating 5/5, loyalty confirmed. Oily skin 38.5: unsuitable. Price and fragrance: identical reserves.
BeautyDecoded user reviews (2 reviews in total)
5.0/5 «Used for years - great skin hydration, plumped up nicely and no warming effect. I stopped using it and forgot about it. I want to go back to it.»
5.0/5 «I loved using it, the two-phase texture is very pleasant. I recommend it but the negative point is the price.»
5.00/5 - 2 opinion BeautyDecoded | Price : ~65 € / 15 ml | Range : Multi-Intensive
BeautyDecoded algorithmic scores
| Profile / Issues | BD score |
| Dry skin | 84.0 |
| Oily skin | 80.5 |
| Normal to dry skin | 91.0 |
| Normal to oily skin | 91.0 |
| Sensitive skin | 0.0 |
| Anti-aging | 23.8 |
| Imperfections | 0.0 |
| Redness | 4.3 |
| Stains | 6.8 |
Verdict Sensitivity (Dr David rule) : Suitable for sensitive skin (score : 0)
Expert deciphering
Multi-active eye contour concentrate. Sensitive skin score: 0 - perfectly adapted. Universal profile (80-91 for all skin types). BeautyDecoded score: 5/5 on 2 reviews with very enthusiastic feedback. Anti-ageing score: 23.8 - moderate but coherent for a highly concentrated contour care product.
BeautyDecoded feedback is particularly strong: «the most effective eye contour treatment I've ever used - smoothes immediately». Signs of rapid, clear-cut effectiveness. Smoothing and moisturizing of the eye contour area unanimously confirmed.
This product stands out positively in the Clarins catalog, with a perfect score and strong qualitative feedback. High price (65€/15 ml) but user feedback justifies the investment. Sensitive skin score 0: no reservations about tolerance, unlike most Clarins products.
My analysis
«The Eye Zone Concentrate is the highest-rated product in the Clarins BeautyDecoded catalog - rating 5/5, sensitive skin 0, enthusiastic feedback on immediate effectiveness. Universal profile. High price (€65/15 ml) but justified by user feedback. A positive exception in a range that is often disappointing on this criterion.»
Verdict: - TOP - Rating 5/5. Sensitive skin 0. Immediate smoothing effect confirmed in reviews. Universal profile. High price but solid returns.
BeautyDecoded user reviews (2 reviews in total)
5.0/5 «Smoothes and moisturizes the eye contour area perfectly.»
5.0/5 «Works immediately - the most effective eye contour treatment I've ever used. Smoothes immediately.»
2.50/5 - 4 opinion BeautyDecoded | Price : ~35 € / 150 ml | Range : Make-up remover
BeautyDecoded algorithmic scores
| Profile / Issues | BD score |
| Dry skin | 84.0 |
| Oily skin | 0.0 |
| Normal to dry skin | 91.0 |
| Normal to oily skin | 14.0 |
| Sensitive skin | -0.5 |
| Anti-aging | 52.7 |
| Imperfections | 0.0 |
| Redness | 0.0 |
| Stains | 10.2 |
Verdict Sensitivity (Dr David rule) : Slight caution recommended (score: -0.5)
Expert deciphering
Waterproof cleansing oil. Oily skin score: 0 - contraindicated. Dry skin score: 84 - suitable. Sensitive skin score : -0.5 - slight caution. BeautyDecoded score: 2.50/5 out of 4 reviews - the lowest in the Clarins catalog.
The 4 BeautyDecoded reviews are unanimously negative: «chemical» or «kerosene» smell, despite the presence of perfume in the INCI (sensory contradiction confirmed), stings the eyes, doesn't rinse off easily, doesn't remove make-up perfectly. These feedbacks converge on two problems: unpleasant smell and insufficient make-up removal efficiency.
Critical signal: the product contains fragrance but is described as having a «chemical kerosene odor» - a signal of a formulation where the fragrance does not fulfill its sensory function. At €35/150 ml, the Q/P ratio is judged very unfavorable in all reviews. A fragrance-free waterproof makeup remover (Huile Démaquillante Uriage, Huile Lavante Bioderma Atoderm) would be more suitable.
My analysis
«Very Cleansing Oil is the FLOP of the Clarins BeautyDecoded catalog - rated 2.50/5 out of 4 reviews, total convergence on unpleasant smell, eye irritation and insufficient effectiveness. Oily skin score 0 confirms poor positioning. At €35, fragrance-free alternatives outperform this product.»
Verdict: - FLOP - Rating 2.50/5 (the lowest in the catalog). Chemical odor despite fragrance, stings the eyes, insufficient makeup removal - confirmed in all reviews. Oily skin score 0.
BeautyDecoded user reviews (4 reviews in total)
2.5/5 «Chemical smell like kerosene - a pity because there is perfume in the INCI. Insufficient effectiveness for the price.»
2.5/5 «Very fragrant oil that doesn't remove makeup perfectly and irritates the eyes. I would not recommend.»
2.5/5 «Bof bof bof. Unpleasant smell, stings the eyes, doesn't rinse off easily. Price completes the negative picture.»
2.5/5 «Not effective on the eyes. Would not recommend.»
3.25/5 - 2 opinion BeautyDecoded | Price : ~36 € / 200 ml | Range : Hydra-Essentiel
BeautyDecoded algorithmic scores
| Profile / Issues | BD score |
| Dry skin | 81.9 |
| Oily skin | 84.0 |
| Normal to dry skin | 81.9 |
| Normal to oily skin | 91.0 |
| Sensitive skin | -8.0 |
| Anti-aging | 26.4 |
| Imperfections | 12.8 |
| Redness | 0.0 |
| Stains | 22.1 |
Verdict Sensitivity (Dr David rule) : Not suitable for sensitive skin (score: -8)
Expert deciphering
Moisturizing toner. Sensitive skin score: -8.0 - the lowest in the Clarins catalog, not recommended for sensitive skin. BeautyDecoded score: 3.25/5 out of 2 reviews. Feedback is clear: strong fragrance, irritates sensitive skin, and one review describes a paradoxical drying effect.
Score for oily skin: 84 and for normal to oily skin: 91 - a suitable profile for tolerant skin. But the sensitive skin score of -8.0 is a major formulatory warning signal: the composition (fragrance, potential alcohols) is clearly unsuitable for reactive skin. A moisturizing toner with such a sensitivity score contradicts its positioning.
Signal confirmed in reviews: «Perfumed toner like most Clarins products - sometimes irritates my sensitive skin.» The other review describes a drying effect - hardly consistent for a «moisturizing toner». At €36/200 ml, the Q/P ratio is questionable.
My analysis
«Lotion Tonique Hydratante has the lowest sensitive skin score in the Clarins catalog analyzed (-8.0). Despite a correct profile for normal to oily skin (84-91), the reviews confirm the problem: irritating fragrance, drying effect. Absolutely not recommended for sensitive skin.»
Verdict: - Sensitive skin score -8.0 (the lowest in the catalog). Irritating fragrance and drying effect confirmed in reviews. Not recommended for sensitive skin.
BeautyDecoded user reviews (2 reviews in total)
3.3/5 «Moisturizing toner, but scented like most Clarins products. Sometimes irritates my sensitive skin. Would not recommend.»
3.3/5 «Cleanses well but not moisturizing. Dries skin a bit - not great.»
3.00/5 - 1 opinion BeautyDecoded | Price : ~42 € / 30 ml | Range : Pure-Reset
BeautyDecoded algorithmic scores
| Profile / Issues | BD score |
| Dry skin | 0.0 |
| Oily skin | 84.0 |
| Normal to dry skin | 46.9 |
| Normal to oily skin | 91.0 |
| Sensitive skin | -7.5 |
| Anti-aging | 57.0 |
| Imperfections | 76.5 |
| Redness | 0.0 |
| Stains | 68.0 |
Verdict Sensitivity (Dr David rule) : Not suitable for sensitive skin (score: -7.5)
Expert deciphering
Anti-imperfections resurfacing serum. Blemish score: 76.5 and spots: 68 - relevant for positioning. Oily skin score: 84 and normal to oily skin score: 91 - optimal profile. Dry skin score: 0 - contraindicated. Sensitive skin score: -7.5 - very unsuitable.
BeautyDecoded score: 3/5 based on 1 single review - insufficient base. The only feedback confirms an action on acne scars, but insufficient on active pimples alone. Sensitive skin score -7.5: consistent with the presence of potentially irritating exfoliating active ingredients on reactive skin.
This product is missing from the source article - discovered via CSV BeautyDecoded. Scores for imperfections (76.5) and blemishes (68) interesting for tolerant oily acneic skin. Sensitive skin score -7.5: to be excluded from sensitive or reactive profiles.
My analysis
«Pure-Reset Blemish Serum has relevant BeautyDecoded scores for blemishes (76.5) and spots (68) on oily skin. Sensitive skin score -7.5: contraindicated for sensitive skin. Only 1 insufficient review. BeautyDecoded discovery missing from source article.»
Verdict: - Correct (tolerant oily skin) - Imperfections 76.5, blemishes 68. Sensitive skin score -7.5: contraindicated. 1 insufficient opinion. BeautyDecoded discovery.
BeautyDecoded user reviews (1 review in total)
3.0/5 «Relatively good product but only insufficient against pimples. Reduces pimple-related scars very well.»
5.00/5 - 1 opinion BeautyDecoded | Price : ~42 € / 75 ml | Range : Hydra-Essentiel
BeautyDecoded algorithmic scores
| Profile / Issues | BD score |
| Dry skin | 36.4 |
| Oily skin | 84.0 |
| Normal to dry skin | 43.4 |
| Normal to oily skin | 91.0 |
| Sensitive skin | -1.5 |
| Anti-aging | 32.3 |
| Imperfections | 25.5 |
| Redness | 0.0 |
| Stains | 6.8 |
Verdict Sensitivity (Dr David rule) : Slight caution recommended (score: -1.5)
Expert deciphering
Mattifying moisturizing gel. Oily skin score: 84 and normal to oily skin score: 91 - optimal profile. Dry skin score: 36.4 - unsuitable. Sensitive skin score: -1.5 - slight caution. Score 5/5 on 1 review (insufficient basis).
The only review confirms a mattifying effect during the day on normal to combination skin (T-zone) without shine, even under make-up. No greasy film. BeautyDecoded discovery missing from source article.
This product is consistent with the gel positioning for oily skin - light aqueous formula, long-lasting mattifying effect. Dry skin score 36.4: to be excluded for this profile.
My analysis
«Matifying Moisturizing Gel is a consistent product for normal to oily skin (scores 84-91), matifying effectiveness confirmed in the single review. BeautyDecoded discovery. Dry skin score 36.4: contraindicated. 1 review insufficient to conclude.»
Verdict: - Correct (oily skin) - Oily skin score 84-91. Matification confirmed. Dry skin score 36.4: contraindicated. BeautyDecoded discovery. 1 review.
BeautyDecoded user reviews (1 review in total)
5.0/5 «Very good moisturizing cream, subtle and pleasant scent. Does not cause shine even at the end of the day and under makeup. Normal to combination skin with T-zone shine.»
The following ranges do not have sufficient BeautyDecoded data in the database. Analysis is based on INCI formulation and clinical positioning.
95% minimum of ingredients of natural origin, objective clinical tests (standardized measurements - not simple satisfaction tests), fragrance-free. Restructuring oil: 98% plant-based, 8 ingredients, organic camellia oil + organic apricot. Clarins philosophy applied correctly: minimalism, efficiency, transparency. Correct prices, proportionate to the formulative value.
Verdict: - The best Clarins range. Objective clinical tests, fragrance-free, fair price. A model of what Clarins should be doing across the range.
Identified corrective active ingredients: hyaluronic acid, glycolic acid, vitamin C - with wild carder extracts as a base. Glycolic acid and vitamin C have independently documented efficacy. Concentration not shown - persistent limit. The most formally honest of Clarins' anti-aging ranges.
Verdict: - The most formally honest anti-aging range. AH + glycolic acid + vit C identified. High price, but less unjustified than Double Serum.
Anti-ageing plant active ingredients: desert date palm, goji berry, acerola, kalanchoe. None of these active ingredients has independent clinical evidence on skin firmness at cosmetic concentrations. Shea butter + oat oil: good hydration for dry, mature skin. At €84, the Q/P ratio is the least favorable of the anti-aging ranges.
Verdict: - Good hydration for dry, mature skin. Firming ingredients with no independent evidence. 84€ excessive.
The star ingredient is harungana - presented by Clarins as «as effective as retinol». This claim is not supported by any published independent clinical studies. Harungana is a plant extract from Madagascar with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties - to compare in-house a botanical extract to retinol (40 years of independent clinical studies, molecular mechanism elucidated) without peer-reviewed publication is a scientifically unjustifiable marketing claim.
Verdict: - Vit C derivative + glycerine correct. Claim «as effective as retinol» for harungana: not independently proven. Supportive care, not corrective.
Is Clarins Double Serum worth the price?
Not for its anti-aging effectiveness. At €86-126, the formula doesn't offer any independently documented corrective anti-aging actives in effective concentration. What you do pay for: the sensoriality of the double bottle, brand prestige, eco-designed packaging, and 21 botanical extracts, most of which have limited evidence. If you're looking for documented anti-ageing efficacy, the same budget allows you to buy several active serums in different concentrations.
Is the fragrance in Clarins formulas problematic?
In the long term, yes for sensitive skin - and BeautyDecoded data confirms this problem: Moisturizing Toner (sensitivity -8.0), Cleansing Oil (rating 2.50/5, eye irritation), Tonic Express Cleanser (2/5, irritating fragrance). The Calm Essentiel range (fragrance-free) is Clarins' answer - but the rest of the range systematically contains fragrances.
Is harungana as effective as retinol as Clarins claims?
This claim is not supported by published independent clinical studies. Harungana is a plant extract with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties - it is a supportive active. Retinol has 40 years of independent studies, an elucidated molecular mechanism at RAR/RXR receptors, and evidence on collagen, pores, texture, wrinkles. The comparison is unjustifiable without peer-reviewed publication.
Which Clarins ranges do you recommend?
Without hesitation: the Calm Essentiel range (objective clinical tests, fragrance-free, reasonably priced) and Aromasoin oils for dry skin. For anti-aging: the Multi Active range is the most honest (AH + glycolic acid + identified vit C). The Extra Firming, Multi Intensive and Double Serum ranges have a formulative price-performance ratio that is hard to justify.
What is the BeautyDecoded application?
BeautyDecoded helps you choose cosmetics adapted to your skin type, thanks to artificial intelligence that analyzes INCI formulations and generates compatibility scores for 80 skin types. It does not constitute a medical consultation. 13 Clarins products have been identified in the database with real data (ratings and user reviews).
BeautyDecoded - The science of skin. Without marketing.
Information for educational purposes only. This information does not replace a medical consultation. Dr Sylvain David, Plastic Surgeon, Researcher and Youtuber.